Essay Outline
Question: Does
the enhancement of critical thinking help students to succeed in their duties?
Thesis: The implementation of critical thinking skills can be
meaningful for students at the school.
Introduction
Hook/Topic sentence: “Learning to think in critically,
analytical, and evaluative ways means using mental processes such as attention,
categorization, selection, and judgment”.
Stella Cottrel (2005)
Background information: Since students at the school
have been pointed out as “receptive”, there might be complications because the
truth is never absolute and knowledge is changeable, it always evolves over time.
Body (1)
Topic sentence: The use of critical thinking skills
in the classroom helps students’ autonomy development.
Supporting sentence: When students are taught how to
think critically, they will have the tools to develop their autonomy since everything
they read would need to be revised and corroborated.
Opposing opinion: Learning to think critically might be tedious and exhausting.
Counter-argument: When the readings are too long or
boring, students get tired of them and prefer doing something aside. Therefore,
professors must find a way to make the learning process more appealing to their
pupils.
Body (2)
Topic sentence: Being critical means selecting
carefully what to rely on and what not to
trust.
Supporting sentence: Critical thinking skills enhance
students’ ability to differentiate among different pieces of information in
order to identify whether the source is reliable or not.
Counter-argument: Students must learn to differentiate among points of view,
agreements, disagreements, arguments, reflections, descriptions, explanation,
and many more.
Body (3)
Topic sentence: When you are able to think in a
critical way enables you to express your thoughts more fluently because your
ideas are supported and well organized.
Supporting sentence: The more you read factual information,
the more trustworthy, undeniable, and coherent your opinion is going to be.
Therefore, students at the school are
going to perform better in test or presentations.
Opposing opinion: Thinking critically means leaving
aside all your prejudices, believes, and perhaps, your feelings because they
create barriers. In fact, these barriers can create a problem among students’
contexts.
Counter-argument: It is important to identify how
much those barriers are blurring your thinking because the opinion or point of
view given by a student might be biased and not objective.
Conclusion:
The implementation of critical thinking skills might have a
meaningful impact at high schools because it would help students to be more
autonomous not only following their own instinct but proposing new
methodologies to improve the teaching-learning process, not to believe every
single word they read on internet or other sources since the Internet has too much false information from
people who just want to fulfill their own interests, and to express themselves
in a more coherent way. In fact, the more you read or watch news or newspaper magazines
or other sources, the more practice you will have identifying what seems
veracious for you to express later in a class discussion or in a debate.
Dear Francisco
ResponderBorrarEven though I have to say this is an excellent outline of a possible research paper you may want to work in the near future, the topic seems far from the discussion we want to have through your essays. The idea is that taking into account the class discussions we have had throughout the sessions, you ponder upon a question related to the implementation/promotion/enhancement of critical thinking skills in the language classroom. By saying this, you can give your paper the approach you want; one where you reflect about the role teachers play in fostering these skills; the influence of our current societies in the development of such competencies in students; domination/hegemony; etc.
Last but not least, the idea is that the authors we have been working with throughout the course provide you with important insights on those aspects. Please, re-think the ideas you want to express in your outline and let me know via email whenever you have it ready to revise it again.
Thanks in advance,
Jhon Losada
By looking at your adjusted outline, I evidence new adjustments that make your paper more appealing for the purposes of the course. However, I would suggest that the debatable question includes a different element from "duties". The word 'duties' is way too general and it could be replaced for something more meaningful. I will now take a look at your first outline and see the correspondence between your outline and what you have written so far.
ResponderBorrarRegards,
Jhon Losada